The Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him”. But more and more cases are being decided based on DNA analysis and drug testing, not witness testimony. Last week, a divided Supreme Court ruled that lab technicians must testify on their results, citing recent reports of mistakes and poor practice in labs across the country. Tech Tuesday explores how questions about technology and science are influencing the nation’s courts.


  • David L. Faigman Professor of Law, University of California Hastings College of the Law; and author, "Laboratory of Justice: The Supreme Court's 200-Year Struggle to Integrate Science and the Law" (Owl Books)
  • Geoffrey S. Mearns Dean, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University; Member, National Academy of Sciences Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community
  • Stephen B. Mercer Defense attorney in private practice, and an Adjunct Professor at the David A. Clarke School of Law at the University of the District of Columbia
  • Glenn Ivey State Attorney for Prince George's County, Maryland

Related Links

Topics + Tags


comments powered by Disqus
Most Recent Shows

Redressing Segregation In Maryland’s Public Higher Education

Thursday, Nov 16 2017The federal court judge who ruled that Maryland's public universities were unlawfully segregated rejected solutions proposed by the state's Higher Education Commission and a group representing a coalition of Maryland Historically Black Colleges and Universities for redressing that segregation. We get an update on the case.