Traditionally, courts have punished those convicted of possessing child pornography with heavy jail time. But in a growing trend, victims are demanding that offenders pay restitution too. The approach is generating debate about how far courts can go in punishing people who are caught with pornography, but aren’t the direct perpetrators of the crime.

Guests

  • Jonathan Turley Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University; practicing defense attorney
  • Steve Kelly Attorney with the Maryland law firm Miles & Stockbridge and Commissioner on the Maryland Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
  • Ernie Allen President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children and the International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children

Related Links

Topics + Tags

Comments

comments powered by Disqus
Most Recent Shows

Maryland’s Conowingo Dam Debate

Thursday, Apr 16 2015Over nearly a century, sediment and nutrients have built up in the reservoir behind the dam, and in major storms those pollutants flow into the Chesapeake. Some believe dredging is the solution; others say the dredging debate is a distraction from watershed pollution upriver. We explore the issues.